Notes of a meeting of all working parties held on 11^th January 2017 at 2.30pm at Roffey Millennium Hall

Purpose of the working parties:- three working parties appointed to jointly develop a full response to the outline planning application recently submitted for development north of Horsham (DC/16/1677). The application includes housing (up to 2,750 dwellings), a business park (up to 46,450 m2), retail, community centre, leisure facilities, education facilities, public open space, landscaping and related infrastructure and has reserved matters except for access.

Remit of this meeting:- to gain updated information from Horsham District Council (HDC).

Joint Working Party Members:- Nicholas Butler, Frances Haigh*, Roland Knight*, Martin Loates, Richard Millington, Helen Ralston, Tony Rickett, David Searle*, Ray Turner*,  Ian Wassell*, Roger Wilton*, Sally Wilton*. Resident Mr Laurie Holt*. Horsham Cycle Forum representative Ruth Fletcher*. Horsham Society representative Philip Ayerst*, HDC case officer David Lowin*, HDC Major Developments Officer, Helen Lowe*.

*Denotes present

Notes
Mr Lowin was expecting an amended application within the next two to three weeks. There had been concerns surrounding:-

• the ancient woodland road crossings – the developer had been asked to consider alternatives if not to offer justification and mitigation.
• Schools and how they would be funded through the Section 106 monies. Discussions were taking place between the developers and West Sussex County Council (WSCC).
• Housing for local needs. Work was being undertaken to try to make the application policy compliant.
• Transport amendments -require further consultation.

There was no indication yet when HDC would consider the application. The working party was informed of the following updated information:-

• Work on S106 is policy compliant and moving forward.
• The developer is very concerned about planning application WSCC/062/16/NH at the Former Wealden Brickworks, Langhurstwood Road for a Recycling, Recovery and Renewable Energy and Ancillary Infrastructure submitted by Britaniacrest Recycling Ltd  as the site is adjacent to their proposed development. They have submitted an objection to WSCC.
• The need for mixed market housing especially 2 and 3 bedroomed houses has been drawn to the attention of the developer.
• WSCC have requested that the applicants refine the modelling of the road layouts within the amended application. WSCC have made attempts to contact and work with Surrey County Council where appropriate.
• Attention has been drawn to the need for the provision of infrastructure within the development as early as possible and clarity around phasing.
• Modelling within the site has been done on the worst case scenario and the railway station had not been taken into consideration for the sustainability of the site. Whilst a parcel of land had been retained for a railway station, the provision was not in the hands of HDC. The potential for a station made the site more sustainable than others.
• If the site for the railway station were to be used to facilitate a Park and Ride scheme there would need to be a variation in the Section 106 agreement. There is the potential that the site for the station could remain undeveloped for a long time.
• It was disappointing that the development hadn’t been put forward as one of the ‘Garden Villages’ announced by the Government in January 2017 as it would have attracted funding. ‘Garden Villages’ are distinct new places, with their own community facilities, rather than extensions to existing urban areas. Helen Lowe would check that this hadn’t been put forward for that scheme.
• There had been an extensive meeting between HDC and the developer regarding “green links”. These would be secured through a legal agreement and it is likely that they would be put into the hands of a management company. The working party suggested that Sussex Wildlife Trust or the Woodland Trust may like to explore taking responsibility for this. HDC will suggest to ecological organisations that they may wish to explore these opportunities. This could be strengthened by an approach from the Parish Council.
• Alternative routes to maximise the preservation of the ancient woodland will be looked at by the developer with HDC.
• There is no detail on the building design at this stage, however, some design code could be set out and submitted.
• It was suggested that the Parish Council starts a dialogue with Liberty.

Mr Lowin agreed to come back to brief the Parish Council in a few weeks time.

 

Further meetings and conclusion

No further meetings were arranged at this stage.

There being no further business the meeting closed at 3.35pm.

Notes taken by the Clerk (Pauline Whitehead)

 

UK Power Networks runs a Priority Services Register which vulnerable people can sign up to, which means that in a power cut help can be provided. This doesn’t mean that your power will be restored quicker than others, but you will have:-

• a 24 hour priority phone number
• A dedicated team who will contact you to keep you updated during a power cut
• Tailored support if needed, such as home visits, hot meals, advice and keeping your friends and relatives updated
• In some scenarios there may be free overnight accommodation and transport to the hotel.

 

To find out more telephone 0800 169 9970 (free from a landline or mobile phone); e-mail psr@ukpowernetworks.co.uk or go to the website www.ukpowernetworks.co.uk

Catherine, Positive Placements coordinator at the YMCA in Horsham, would love to hear from anyone interested in volunteering as a mentor, to help a vulnerable young person (for about an hour a week) on their journey back to education, training and employment.

All sorts of people, from all walks of life, become mentors for all sorts of reasons and maybe this is just the thing you’ve been looking to get involved with – maybe volunteering will be one of your new year’s resolutions!

Reasons volunteers give include being passionate about using their skills to help young people; contributing back into society because of their privileged life; believing the experience of growing up in the care system, or of having little support at a crucial time, gives them an understanding and empathy to make a difference; appreciating the support from a volunteer at a specific time in their own life and wanting to ‘pass the volunteering forward’.

One volunteer says, “Some people do it [mentoring] to give something back, but for me the greatest reward is to be part of the process as someone turns their life around and to interact and learn from the young people themselves.”

There’s loads of support and guidance from the award-winning Positive Placements team – you just need to want to help young people build their confidence and overcome barriers to unleash their potential.

If you would like to find out a bit more then please contact Catherine Pardoe, at Horsham Y Centre 07392 879 247 catherine.pardoe@ymcadlg.org

As many residents will know, Horsham District Council intends to charge for parking at the Godwin Way Car Park from April 2017. Horsham District Council offered the Parish Council an opportunity to take responsibility for the car park  and the Parish Council canvassed local businesses to ascertain if they would support them in a bid to manage the car park, offer a contribution to the upkeep and keep it free of charge to users, but there was very little support for this option. Horsham District Council had offered a lease on the Car Park, but issues associated with drainage, resurfacing and ongoing maintenance could have seen the Parish Council responsible and accountable for large bills in the future.

The Parish Council formally considered taking responsibility for the Car Park at their January Parish Council Meeting but, as there were still many outstanding questions and great uncertainty about the overall liability to the Council that could have a long term financial effect on local residents they rejected the offer.

Information about the proposals for the Godwin Way Car park can be found on Horsham District Council’s website

https://www.horsham.gov.uk/latest-news/news/november-2016/changes-to-rural-car-parking-arrangements

Notes of a meeting of all working parties held on 14th December 2016 at 2pm at Roffey Millennium Hall

Purpose of the working parties:- three working parties appointed to jointly develop a full response to the outline planning application recently submitted for development north of Horsham (DC/16/1677). The application includes housing (up to 2,750 dwellings), a business park (up to 46,450 m2), retail, community centre, leisure facilities, education facilities, public open space, landscaping and related infrastructure and has reserved matters except for access.
Remit of this meeting:- to gain updated information from WSCC Highways and to obtain guidance regarding the scope of any supporting work required on the Traffic Survey within the application.
Joint Working Party Members:- Nicholas Butler, Frances Haigh*, Roland Knight, Martin Loates, Richard Millington, Helen Ralston*, Tony Rickett, David Searle*, Ray Turner*, Ian Wassell*, Roger Wilton, Sally Wilton. Resident Mr Laurie Holt. Horsham Cycle Forum representative Ruth Fletcher*. Horsham Society representative Philip Ayerst*, West Sussex County Council Highways representative Ian Gledhill* .
*Denotes present

Notes
Ian Gledhill reported that there had been very little movement since WSCC had submitted its response to the planning application in September 2016. However, Peter Brett Associates had been in touch earlier this week, but Ian had not had the opportunity to study the correspondence.

He suggested that there may be a package of information from the developer for consideration in January 2017, but he had no definite information. Once the additional information was submitted there would be a 21 day consultation which starts when the amendment is validated by Horsham District Council.

The proposed planning application for a Recycling Plant and Incinerator at the old Wealdon brickworks on Langhurstwood Road was imminent and whilst there was no doubt that the two applications impacted on each other, they would run separately.

Clarification of the decision making process for application DC/16/1677 and where influence and power lies ensued. The ultimate decision makers are Horsham District Council’s elected members as a corporate body as HDC is the planning authority.

Concern was raised regarding the potential for gridlock within Horsham due to additional traffic movements associated with houses built during ongoing phasing in existing developments. Further concern was raised regarding the road conditions surrounding the turning to Earles Meadow from Crawley Road. Ian confirmed that the traffic survey submitted by Liberty includes best guesses for the cumulative effect from all developments in the surrounding area. The traffic survey examined the scenario with a railway station but not at the situation should a railway station not be provided. He also confirmed that the decision regarding the railway station would be made by the Department for Transport and that no Section 106 discussions had been started. Highways England have submitted their comments as have Crawley Council, however, Surrey County Council are yet to submit.

The representative from the Cycle Forum supported underpasses to allow free movement across the A264, but it would appear that Peter Brett Associates, on behalf of the developers, doubt their viability. WSCC have not been asked to look at this aspect of the development.

A discussion around the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and its statement of sustainability ensued.

Ian Gledhill advised waiting for more information before employing a consultant to undertake a critique or peer review of the existing traffic survey.

Concern was expressed regarding the routes through the site, especially in relation to ancient woodland and it was suggested that this was a question for the HDC case officer.

Ian Gledhill left the meeting at 3.00pm

The discussion from this point centred around how to progress with a peer review/ critique of the traffic survey. The practical final outcome was to draw out a scope from the notes made from all of the working party meetings so far.

It was suggested that an agenda was provided for the next working party meeting.

Further meetings and conclusion
No further meetings were arranged at this stage.
There being no further business the meeting closed at 3.40pm.
Notes taken by the Clerk (Pauline Whitehead)